Executive Summary
COS Strategic Plan
2026-2028

Advancing Lifecycle Open Science

Overview

The Center for Open Science (COS) exists to increase the openness, integrity, and trustworthiness of research. Over the next three years (2026–2028), we will focus our work around a single, unifying strategic direction: advancing Lifecycle Open Science. We will employ a practical, systems-level approach to making research more transparent, credible, and reusable across its entire lifecycle.

This strategic plan represents a convergence of our infrastructure, research, policy, and community-building activities. Rather than expanding into new mission areas, our plan sharpens focus, aligns programs, and strengthens evidence-based pathways for sustainable change in the research culture.

Access Full Strategic Plan

Mission, Vision, and Purpose

  • Mission: To increase the openness, integrity, and trustworthiness of research.

  • Vision: To enable a research culture that removes friction in knowledge production by manifesting transparency, sharing, inclusion, rigor, integrity, repeatability, trustworthiness, and identification and correction of error and uncertainty across the entire research lifecycle.

  • Purpose: To improve the quality of research production, consumption, and evaluation to accelerate advancement of knowledge, solutions, and treatments.

gretchen

 

True North: Lifecycle Open Science

Our True North is advancing Lifecycle Open Science, defined as research with publicly accessible plans, contents (data, materials, code), and outcomes that are linked and findable in a persistent, open location.

Lifecycle Open Science makes the foundations of research claims visible and assessable. It enables research consumers to evaluate credibility, reuse materials, and identify strengths, weaknesses, and uncertainties. It also increases accountability among research producers and accelerates cumulative knowledge building.

LOS new

 

Why Lifecycle Open Science Matters

Who benefits from Lifecycle Open Science? Everyone who relies on evidence.

Researchers

Easier collaboration and reuse; clearer methods and materials; faster learning and replication.

Practitioners & Public Services

Better sharing of evidence and uncertainty for use in programs, services, and policy.

People & Communities

Credible research shows its work to shape public understanding and earn trust.
world

 

Strategic Objectives

We will advance Lifecycle Open Science through three mutually reinforcing strategic objectives:

COS-1527 (1)

 

1

Demonstrate Pathways

Showcase real-world examples of Lifecycle Open Science across disciplines, geographies, and communities. 

  • Show Lifecycle Open Science in practice: Develop and share case studies that show what Lifecycle Open Science looks like in practice.

  • Surface enabling conditions: Identify the conditions that enable (or constrain) adoption and impact.

  • Translate lessons into actions: Create an evidence catalog of insights others can adapt and adopt.

Outputs: Case studies • Standardized framework • Evidence catalog

2

Improve Pathways

Iteratively improve tools, infrastructure, training, and policy interventions that make Lifecycle Open Science possible, easy, and worthwhile.

  • Improve what works: Use evidence from case studies, metrics, and community engagement to guide improvements.

  • Meet communities where they are: Apply readiness-guided engagement to tailor support and investment.

  • Close the feedback loop: Strengthen feedback loops across infrastructure, research, policy, and community efforts.

How: Evidence → iteration → impact

3

Promote Pathways

Mobilize evidence, partnerships, and coordinated communications to accelerate adoption of Lifecycle Open Science.

  • Tell a clear Lifecycle Open Science story: Share aligned narratives about the value and impact of Lifecycle Open Science across programs.

  • Partner with change agents: Collaborate with partners positioned to catalyze adoption in their communities.

  • Build capacity to sustain Lifecycle Open Science: Emphasize co-creation and sustained engagement grounded in demonstrated value.

Not just advocacy: equip communities to adopt and sustain Lifecycle Open Science

Theory of Change

We advance Lifecycle Open Science through a systems-based Theory of Change, recognizing that no single intervention is sufficient. Culture change requires coordinated action across five interdependent levers. 

These efforts are supported by continuous research and evaluation to assess effectiveness, identify boundary conditions, and inform adaptation.

toc1

 

Readiness-Guided Engagement Model

The Readiness-Guided Engagement Model recognizes that research communities engage with open science in different ways and at different times. By working collaboratively and building on existing interests, the model supports thoughtful exploration, adoption, and growth of open practices across the research lifecycle.

Philosophical

Is the open practice relevant in our research context?

What are the risks and opportunities?

Exploratory

How could the open practice be done?

Proof of concept case.

Formal Testing

Does the open practice meet its promise?

Are there unintended consequences?

Implementation

How to make it efficient and effective?

FAIR standards.

Scale-up

Engage community for adoption.

Evaluate boundary conditions.

Program Areas

We organize our work across five program areas aligned with the Theory of Change. An innovation pipeline moves ideas from experimentation to scalable, durable solutions.

sp icon 1

Assessing Research Practices

Understand current behaviors to identify opportunities for open science interventions.

sp icon 2

Reimagining
Research

Pilot and evaluate innovative policies, practices, and solutions for research progress.

sp icon 3

Open Science Infrastructure

Develop and maintain open-source products and collaborative platforms to enable Lifecycle Open Science.

sp icon 4

Open Science Solutions

Provide free, accessible tools and incentives to make Lifecycle Open Science standard and rewarded.

sp icon 5 new

Capacity Building

Support researchers, organizations, and communities to adopt Lifecycle Open Science.

Operating Model

  • Quarterly OKR cycles: Transparent metrics and cross-team alignment through collaboratively developed OKRs that emphasize interdependence and provide a shared framework for assessing operational health and strategic advancement.

  • Annual strategic review & priority-setting: A structured review with leadership, functional teams, and the Board—assessing progress, emerging opportunities, resource needs, and risks. Insights from evidence, case studies, partner engagements, and financial scenarios inform refined priorities for the year ahead.

  • Decision heuristics for opportunities: Consistent questions to evaluate potential projects and partnerships—maintaining focus on high-impact work and aligning new commitments with mission, capacity, and long-term sustainability.

Sustainability

To support long-term impact, we will pursue an integrated sustainability strategy focused on resilience, stewardship of open infrastructure, and mission alignment. Key priorities include:

  • Diversifying global and cross-sector partnerships

  • Increasing unrestricted and philanthropic support

  • Growing mission-aligned earned revenue

  • Improving operational efficiency and cost discipline

This balanced financial approach enables us to maintain durable public-good infrastructure while remaining adaptable in a changing global environment.

Looking Ahead

This strategic plan positions us to lead with focus, evidence, and collaboration at a time when trust in research is both critically important and contested.

By demonstrating, improving, and promoting Lifecycle Open Science, we will strengthen our partnerships with researchers, institutions, funders, and policymakers worldwide to build a more trustworthy, transparent, and effective research social system.

Access Full Strategic PlanDownload Executive Summary Slide Deck